Automobile case in which our client was rear-ended on the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel and injured his neck. Our client had an operation on his neck and was a nuclear technician aboard an aircraft carrier.
The medical expenses were extremely low because all of the medical treatment was performed by the U.S. Navy. $50,000 was offered before trial and the case was tried to a jury in Norfolk Circuit Court and we obtained a jury verdict of $1.5 Million for our client.
Automobile. Our client and his two children were struck by a drunk driver. Unfortunately, our client was killed in the collision. His two infant children survived. After litigation, we were able to resolve the case for the full amount of the insurance coverage.
In this case, we obtained structured settlements for the infant children that greatly increased their recovery beyond the insurance coverage and provided for educational funds and living expenses once they reached the age of majority.
Automobile. Our client was injured in a motor vehicle collision on the interstate. Received injuries to her neck and low back. The defense to the position that our client was not injured to the extent that she claimed.
Automobile. Our client was injured in a motor vehicle collision in which his girlfriend was driving and she was at fault for the accident. After litigation, we were able to resolve the case for our client.
Automobile / pedestrian accident. Our client was struck by a drunk driver while crossing the street in downtown Norfolk. The insurance company was defending the case on the grounds that our client was contributorily negligent and that she lacked significant injuries. A lawsuit was filed against the drunk driver and the case settled prior to trial.
Automobile / pedestrian accident. Our client was struck by a drunk driver while a pedestrian in the City of Richmond while attending VCU University. We filed a lawsuit in the City of Richmond and settled the case for the full amount of the liability coverage with additional participation from our client’s own underinsurance carrier.
Automobile. Our client was struck in the rear by a local transit bus but there was minimal damage to the vehicles.
Automobile. Our client was struck and injured by a drunk driver. The insurance carrier denied insurance coverage claiming that the defendant was not within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. After litigation, we were able to obtain $250,000 from the employer’s insurance carrier.
Automobile. Our client was involved in a motor vehicle collision and received injuries to her low back. The insurance company had surveillance film which showed her able to complete some tasks of daily activities. We were able to overcome the surveillance films and obtain $275,000 for our client.
Automobile-wrongful death case. The other driver alleged that our client was on the wrong side of the roadway in a head on collision and there were no witnesses to the collision. Our client was not employed at the time of the accident and the insurance company attempted to attack her reputation in the community.
Federal Tort Claim – automobile – neck injuries. Our client was involved in an accident with a person in the military and the claim was required to be brought in Federal Court under the Federal Tort Claims Act. There was minor damage to the vehicles and the Government maintained that our client’s claim was barred under the Federal Employer’s Compensation Act. After defeating the Government’s defense that our client’s claim was barred, we successfully overcame the Government’s attack on our client’s injuries.
Automobile accident / wrongful death case. Our client was killed in North Carolina by a drunk driver who crossed the center line. We assisted the victim’s family through the defendant’s criminal trial and settled the case for the maximum amount of the insurance coverage by stacking all available insurance policies.
Automobile / wrongful death case. Our elderly client was killed while making a left turn at traffic light. The case was defended on the grounds that our client failed to obey her traffic light and was contributorily negligent. After extensive discovery and litigation, the case was settled in mediation for $600,000.
Automobile accident. Our client was injured in Williamsburg, VA, in a car accident. We were referred by another attorney to handle the case and the case settled after a lawsuit was filed.
Automobile accident. Our client was driving his personal motor vehicle through a shopping center parking lot when he was struck by a bus. The bus company denied responsibility claiming that our client was at fault for the collision. We filed a lawsuit on behalf of our client and the case settled before trial for $150,000.
Automobile / bus accident. Our client was struck by a bus after exiting the bus. She sustained injuries to her neck and back which resulted in a low back fusion and she will require future surgeries to her neck and back for her injuries.
Our client is unable to work for the rest of her life as a result of her injuries. We resolved the case so that our client does not have to work and can afford her future medical treatment. The terms and amount of the settlement are confidential.
Automobile accident. Our client was struck by a driver while on his motorcycle and recovered the maximum amount of insurance coverage.
Automobile accident. Our client was struck in the rear by another vehicle with very little property damage. The insurance company hired an orthopedic surgeon to testify that our client was minimally injured and to dispute her injuries. Our client was offered $12,000 and the case was tried to verdict with a jury and we obtained a verdict of $100,000, which was the maximum limit of available insurance in the case.
Automobile accident. Our client was struck by a drunk driver and had injuries to her neck and back. The extent of the client’s injuries were contested by the insurance carrier, suit was filed and the case favorably settled prior to trial.
Our client was struck by a drunk driver and aggravated her pre-existing low back condition. After a lawsuit was filed and before trial, we were able to successfully settle the case in mediation for $230,000.00.
Our client was struck by a commercial vehicle and had bodily injuries. The client’s actual medical treatment did not reflect the proper value of the case. The insurance carrier’s initial offer was $45,000 and we achieved a settlement of $85,000 for our client.
Our client was involved in a motor vehicle collision, and unfortunately, died of causes unrelated to the collision. The client’s untimely death created evidentiary issues with proving the extent of our client’s losses. We were able to settle the case for $100,000 despite evidentiary problems with the case since our client had died from unrelated causes.
Legal malpractice. Our client was previously represented by another law firm for an out of state automobile accident that failed to file suit within the limitations period. The case was defended on technical legal grounds as well as on the client’s injuries. After filing suit and through mediation, the case was favorably settled.
Premises / slip and fall. Our client was injured in her office building in Richmond, VA where she fell and broke her hip. We overcame difficult liability issues and were able to obtain a very favorable settlement for our client.
Premises / slip and fall. Our client was injured when she was in the garden center of a local store. An employee allegedly pulled a hose causing our client to fall and sustain injuries. The store denied the incident and the case was settled through mediation while in litigation.
Our client was participating in an aerobics class at a commercial gym when a mirror fell and struck our client. After suit was filed we were able to successfully settle the case for $125,000.00.
Allergic reaction / exposure to lemon-scented cleaning solution. Our client is highly allergic to products that contain lemon scents. Despite being on notice of her specific problems, a cleaning company where our client worked utilized a cleaning solution that contained lemon-based products resulting in a hospitalization and respiratory problems for our client. The case settled after a lawsuit was filed.
$100,000 Dog Bite
Our client, a minor, was bitten by a dog and sustained injuries. We settled the case for the maximum insurance coverage of $100,000.00 and obtained a structured settlement for our client that will preserve and maximize the recovery for our minor client.
Medical malpractice case in which our client was operated on by a neurosurgeon for a low back problem and she had complications which resulted in the loss of her legs. The case was defended vigorously with experts that maintained that our client’s injuries were a risk of the procedure. The cap in this case was $1.5 million and we obtained $1.225 million for our client.
Our client was injured as a result of being misdiagnosed by a radiologist who failed to determine that he had a brain tumor. The case was defended by the doctor that a correct diagnosis would not have changed our client’s outcome and that the statute of limitations had expired because the misdiagnoses was made well before the statute of limitation on our client’s claim expired. We obtained an award of $500,000 for our client.
Our client was injured while working as a deck hand on the tugboat Buchanan 14. His injuries occurred when he was struck in the forehead by a pipe wrench that he was ordered by the Captain to use to take in slack on a winch that was located in the rear of the vessel.
Our client sustained a comminuted and depressed outer-table frontal sinus fracture and a 5.5 cm full thickness laceration of the glabellar region of the forehead. He was operated on at Maryland where he had an open reduction / internal fixation of the left depressed frontal sinus and skull fracture and a complex closure of his forehead laceration.
He spent several days in the hospital before returning to his home in Virginia Beach. A neuropsychologist diagnosed our client with a mild traumatic brain injury. Our client had been released from medical care without any permanent work restrictions or impairment.
The defendant contested liability claiming that our client was properly instructed on the use of the winch and he was inattentive and contributorily negligent for his injuries. The defendant also contested our client’s diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury.
Our client was a longshoreman that had an injury to his hand while working on a container ship. The defense argued strongly that our client was contributorily negligent and not entitled to any recovery.
Unfortunately, our client was a recovering drug addict with a lengthy criminal record. The defense attempted to discredit our client’s injuries and hold him accountable for them.
$325,000 / $125,000
Our client was injured on a private boat and the insurance carrier for the boat and the operator of the boat denied insurance coverage, refused to provide a defense to the boat operator and refused to make a settlement offer.
We obtained a judgment against the operator for $325,000 and successfully litigated and settle the insurance coverage case against the boat insurance for $125,000.00.
Product liability. We represented numerous individuals that received a defective hip implant that was manufactured by Sulzer Orthopedics. Sulzer initially denied liability and contended that there was no defect in their hip implant. A confidentiality order was executed in the case that prevents us from disclosing the terms of the award.
Product liability / municipal liability. Our client, a retired Navy Seal, was traveling in his personal truck from Florida to Virginia when suddenly and without warning, he suffered a tire tread separation in South Carolina. Unfortunately, he struck a concrete highway support and was killed instantly.
The tire was manufactured by a leading tire manufacturer and our investigation revealed that the tire contained a defect that caused our client’s fatal injuries. The case was vigorously defended by the tire manufacturer and was successfully resolved prior to trial against the manufacturer.
The South Carolina Department of Transportation was also pursued for a defect in the design of the highway and settled early in the litigation. The award and terms of the settlement with the tire manufacturer are confidential.
Disclaimer: The following accounts have either been published previously by various entities unrelated to Swartz, Taliaferro, Swartz, & Goodove, P.C. or have been prepared by us for dissemination to visitors to our website. The results obtained in specific cases depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. The past results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by our firm. The result obtained under one set of circumstances cannot be a predictor of the result likely to be obtained in a case that necessarily involves different circumstances. You should draw no conclusions about your particular legal matter from reading these accounts.
Get aggressive representation from attorneys who have handled many high-profile cases, when you choose Swartz, Taliaferro,
Swartz & Goodove.